Cochlear Implants – Miraculous Or Monstrous?

When someone has a hearing loss, there are several options that may be considered to help restore or create an improved sense of hearing. One of these options is the classic and familiar hearing aid. Another option is the cochlear implant. While the classic hearing aid appears to have been mostly accepted and incorporated into deaf society, there has been a torrent of controversy about the cochlear implant since the device was first introduced several decades ago.

Why is there a difference in perception between the classic hearing aid and the cochlear implant, and why has there been such controversy over the implant?

Cochlear Implants

The classic hearing aid can be contained mostly within the ear, or can have an additional component that hangs over the ear and tucks behind the ear. The cochlear implant is a device whose use requires head surgery that includes implantation of electrodes into the cochlea, which is the organ of hearing in the inner ear. In addition a small magnetic plate is inserted under the skin. The exterior parts of the device are attached to the user’s head by the use of this plate and by looping over the ear like the classic hearing aid.

Those in favor of the use of cochlear implants very often hold the medical view that hearing loss is a deficiency that should be corrected if possible. They feel that the implants represent nothing more culturally significant than a nearsighted person adopting the use of eyeglasses or contact lenses. Those not in favor of the implants often hold the position that deafness is not a deficiency, but that it is an identity and a culture. They fear that cochlear implants will contribute to the destruction of that culture. In some cases there may also be discomfort about the actual implantation of technology into the body.

A cochlear implant is an electronic hearing aid that comes in several parts. The first part is the microphone. It is worn hanging behind the ear, like a traditional hearing aid. It is attached by wires to a transmitter and a speech processor, which contain a magnet.

The second part is surgically implanted under the skin covering the mastoid bone, which is the bone just behind the ear. The third part is implanted into the round window of the cochlea, which is the part of the inner ear that is designed for hearing. The round window is a tiny membrane in the wall of the cochlea.

The cochlear implant’s speech processor is worn against the head, attached by a magnet through the skin to the second part implanted under the skin. On those users who wear their hair short, the outer components of a cochlear implant are much more visible than a traditional hearing aid.

A patient who has received a cochlear implant must recover from the surgery for several weeks before the implant can be activated. When it is activated, the device must be “mapped” to deliver amplification that is tailored to the user’s particular hearing loss.

Children who receive these implants may be surprised by the new restrictions they face. Due to the possibility of static discharge, these children cannot play with balloons or play in ball pits, or engage in any other activities that may produce static electricity. Any static discharge would erase the individualized mapping of the implant.

What are the best- and worst-case scenarios of using a cochlear implant? Some users report life-changing results that seem nothing short of miraculous. Conversely, some users receive very little benefit from the device. There are many variables that may affect the results achieved. These variables include the user’s pre-existing physical conditions, the user’s level of language development, and the age of onset of the hearing loss. In addition, during implantation any natural residual hearing the user may have had is permanently destroyed. Like any device, a cochlear implant eventually wears out and will need to be replaced, necessitating further surgery.

If the prospective user is very young, the decision to implant this device can be a difficult one for the child’s parents. In order for parents to make a well-informed decision, all the possible advantages as well as the risks and disadvantages must be presented and carefully weighed.

For more information on assisted devices for those with a hearing loss, please visit hearmore.com.

http://hearmore.com

Source: EzineArticles.com

Tinnitus Surgery – a Good Option For Treating the Illness

We know that tinnitus is a very annoying condition. If hearing a ringing or a buzzing sound that nobody else hears incessantly is not enough, it may also cause disruption in your work and your personal life. You may even not get a complete rest. On the other hand, there could be persons who may think that you are losing your sanity. Doctors may even doubt your story even after performing several tests. Fortunately, there are different tinnitus surgery practices that can remedy your condition. These surgeries are proven effective in treating the various forms of tinnitus.

ear surgery

Curing Objective Tinnitus
Many people may not know this, but ringing is not the only sound a tinnitus patient may hear. Other sounds include buzzing, screeching, cracking, and clicking. If the last two sounds are what you hear, or you know someone who has the same sound bugging them, you may be in luck. Those are symptoms that can be labeled under objective tinnitus.

In this medical condition, a specialist will be able to listen to the same sounds using a monitor. The specific sounds are usually created by blood flows or spasms in the muscle. If such is the case, the appropriate surgery is radio surgery using a gamma knife. Another surgical procedure would be to use Teflon to shield the cochlea of the ear.

Surgery for Subjective Tinnitus
It is more difficult when the sound you are hearing is completely undetectable. This is because the causes may vary, and there is even a rare possibility that the condition is not physical anymore. These cases are called subjective tinnitus.

Because it is subjective, it would also be difficult for the doctor to recommend the most effective tinnitus surgery for you.

Just to give you an idea, though, subjective tinnitus could be caused by hearing a loud noise for too long and without the use of an earplug. A good example is when a group of people are using jackhammers just outside your home. There are also those who were simply close to an explosion or a loud speaker feedback. There are also medications that, if left unchecked, cause damage to the ear.

A promising procedure is to apply an electrode into the ear of the patient. Technically, it can be labeled as minor electrocution, the point of which is to reduce the sound and even completely erase it. The only problem with this is that living cells around the electrode may perish, forcing the surgery to be possible only for persons who are becoming or already deaf.

Other surgeries can be applied but only if the cause has been clearly identified. For instance, if the tinnitus is caused by a tumor around the ear, then the tumor can be removed. If a patient has been diagnosed to have fistula (a barrier between the middle and inner ear), surgery can be done to take out the problem.

Other Treatments
You must also take note that even without tinnitus surgery, there are still a number of ways in curbing the sound. One is by listening to other sounds. Listening to an appropriate sound will help you reduce your focus on the noise inside your ears. Taking the right food is also helpful, such as reducing the use of salt. Alternative treatments like acupuncture and medications like ginkgo biloba have been known to treat tinnitus too.

Paul Carrington is a widely recognized Tinnitus healing expert (and author of the best-selling tinnitus remedy eBook ‘Banish Tinnitus!’

For more crucial info on tinnitus surgery, visit Paul’s tinnitus resource site: http://www.TinnitusTreatmentAdvice.com.

Source: EzineArticles.com

|

Powered by Yahoo! Answers